27 May 2011 00:07 / heartbreak brunch

i thought you were what i got to know but instead you're what i get to write about. next time i'll be more careful or not. when i try now to picture your silhouette, against which others are only measured, it's blinding not because it's pretty but reflective. your outline, a big mirror, is brighter than snow and the symbol's simple enough, i never really got inside you or however 1 might put it. i acknowledge reflections can't decide they'll differ and that this is a shitty way to think of us, so as you requested when we still talked i stopped.

1 more time idleness lights a meal we ate 2ce, years+years back, weeks into living here. challah grilled cheese w bok choy same blue table. not even that great, try and know what it conceals, did i learn something 1 or both times that made me want to protect you? bendix diner's not there anymore, neither are most things and when this dual moment haloes i wonder. in this city that 'doesn't' nap, light reeks like sunday at 330pm. brunch won't cease, night came yesterday, sleep through monday but not what i want to speak about.

on the street by where the city's first trader joe's later got built we saw the actor who played 'justin' on a gay cable drama and this doesn't matter either, at all, except i remember following your eyes in a way that was similar to something i couldn't call back but gave me déja vu so consuming it stung. not good or bad hurt just deep. not able to articulate what was happening, i saw besides it had happened before in almost exactly the same way which was touching and hard. the past was the most difficult thing i ever felt, until the future.

happiest dancing across from you in 2/4, look for a better word than happiest. indicate not a degree of feeling but a kind: the way 1 stood by the fire or didn't, has sucked cock for $$ or hasn't. become delibertately inarticulate instead. spend your summer on it.

scan the same photograph, drink mexican coke made ill by my 'lifestyle'. a room with no view is preferred; somewhere there's a ticket. i won't google you. i promise. how can you keep the same haircut and change everything else? don't answer that i mean, can if you want.


1.1(c)2011xxox

 

04 November 2007 01:17 / summer 2007


It Was Beautiful I'm Done with It
~7.5x11" / 19.05 x 27.94 cm


--
fucking finally. spent all summer in the sun and street, broke as hell but having lots of fun. lots...

it's november again, cold again. time for another big art project like the 62 drawings i did last november. i'll be inside, working working working.

and around christmas, time to take my works round to galleries. no excuses.

in other news, Dov Charney's a pretty awesome dude. he's been around my store a lot lately.


--
ps- josh, your drawing is next- not the poster, but the next illustration-size drawing. i'm looking for the right subject for the colors you chose. mwah.

 

23 July 2007 05:54 / editions on pause


Lion Like Whoa
25x30" / 63.5 x 76.2 cm

mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust
mustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmustmust

 

28 March 2007 17:27 / it's a fucking clothing store

and the award for most pretentiously named business on Smith St goes to


Dear Fieldbinder COMMA

i tried to look up 'fieldbinder' in the dictionary but it wasn't there

 

02 December 2006 15:33 / your feet are going to be in the ground with the rest of you

The things that confuse most people have never confused me. Who I want to fuck? Myself as Robert Mapplethorpe, forever. What happens to us after we die? We flop back onto the world, returning everything we won and grabbing at what we lost. The things that confound me are tiny and specific: numbers, flames, pieces of hair. These things are much more confusing. It is easier to picture creation clearly than it is a fire.

Last night, though, sitting on the edge of my bed in my first track jacket [red of course], I experienced my first spiritual crisis while looking at a pretty small cross-section of delivery menus from my neighborhood. It was one of the most ecstatic things I have ever felt in my life. Now I get why people like to be confused about giant things like why we are here; how: the slip never ends? Freefall surely isn't the only freedom, but it must be in the top 3.

When I was growing up, I was never a particularly churchy person because my parents only ever took me to one [obviously not unusual], La Cañada Presbyterian. Kevin Costner and his family also went[/go?] there. The place is preppy, fake, and boring to the max. I loathed being ordered to dress up. Too many people in the congregation had had plastic surgery[*], and the entire sight was just kind of sickening and scary to me. The church was located across from the only place I ever remember seeing a cigarette machine, a chain restaurant called Conrad's in a strip mall that also held a Vons market, Baskin Robbins ice cream, and my mom's favorite drycleaner.

I remember what bugged me most about church, starting from when I was little and through high school [after which i kind of forgot that people even go to church], was the idea that the world had been created for humans. I found it arrogant, and also for some reason, a lot of people used this idea to justify the idea of eating meat to me, or even to instruct me to eat meat [including, repeatedly, i shit you not, the extremely conservative Christian math teacher i had throughout most of high school]. When I think about the idea of a human-centric world now, the idea of 'meat' just has nothing to do with it. I'm sort of fascinated by the fact that these concepts were even connected in the minds of so many people I knew.

So, last night. I was ever so slightly drugged and sitting on the edge of my bed with maybe like 4 or 5 menus in my hand [we probably have about 40 from restaurants that will deliver here], trying to think of what I wanted to eat, and I got extreme vertigo, and I fell, not over physically, but just fell, dropped out. It was like being a ghost and walking through the papers that were in my hands in front of me. It felt so amazing. I don't know how long it happened. It wasn't instantaneous, and it didn't last longer than 15 minutes, but it could have been a few minutes or a couple seconds, I don't know.

I was realizing that there were god, what?, over 500 [vegetarian] dishes that I could order and have brought to me? And suddenly I considered that if the world was created for humans to use? That is actually the humblest way to possibly think of it. If the world was not created for us, we absolutely took it anyway and we are going to use it right up. How. Fucking

um

oh

For the first time I read the introduction to The Thief's Journal in the original French. The Grove translations of Genet's books are all loveably awkward [lots of 'i buggered him' and 'we were buggering together'... i expect to see new ones sometime in my lifetime]. The translations of Sartre's introductions are also slightly off. The idea at the end of the introduction to The Thief's Journal more or less makes it through, though: basically, every person's greatest secret is that s/he is exactly the same as you. This is totally distinct from the idea that 'we are all the same', which is how a lot of people misread the introduction. What Sartre is pointing to is the bigness and darkness of the secret, and the possibility of endless twins and mirrors. S/he is the same as you, s/he is the same as Jean Genet, and you are the same as Jean Genet, but the three are not the same. There are secret endless twins, but no triplets. I guess I'd phrase it: what no one will ever reveal to you, specifically, is that s/he is exactly the same as you, specifically.

It took me a long time to put my head back on after I read that. As far as I am concerned, there is hardly anywhere to go from there except to blood and bleach and out. It was months before I even started the actual book.

If that is our enormous and unlit, well, a smaller wink belongs to you and me


--

Our Littlest Secret

 

23 July 2006 21:30 / Up up

earlier / earliest

 

04 July 2006 22:27 / Eva


Open Your Mouth, 2006

context

 

above are the entries filed under 'brooklyn'.

all other entries are in the directory. some questions are answered at return the ring.